Hi,
I was playing with shm_mq and found a little odd behavior with detaching
after sending messages.
Following sequence behaves as expected (receiver gets 2 messages):
P1 -> set_sender
P1 -> attach
P2 -> set_receiver
P2 -> attach
P1 -> send
P2 -> receive
P1 -> send
P1 -> detach
P2 -> receive
P2 -> detach
But if I do first receive after detach like in this sequence:
P1 -> set_sender
P1 -> attach
P2 -> set_receiver
P2 -> attach
P1 -> send
P1 -> send
P1 -> detach
P2 -> receive
I get SHM_MQ_DETACHED on the receiver even though there are messages in
the ring buffer.
The reason for this behavior is that mqh_counterparty_attached is only
set by shm_mq_receive. This does not seem to be consistent - I would
either expect to get SHM_MQ_DETACHED always when other party has
detached or always get all remaining messages that are in queue (and I
would strongly prefer the latter).
Maybe the shm_mq_get_bytes_written should be used to determine if there
is something left for us to read in the receiver if we hit the
!mqh_counterparty_attached code path with detached sender?
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
