Re: Planner hints in Postgresql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Planner hints in Postgresql
Date
Msg-id 53277291.2090908@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Planner hints in Postgresql  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Planner hints in Postgresql  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/17/14, 2:16 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Pavel Stehule<pavel.stehule@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> >I don't believe so SELECTIVITY can work well too. Slow queries are usually
>> >related to some strange points in data. I am thinking so well concept should
>> >be based on validity of estimations. Some plans are based on totally wrong
>> >estimation, but should be fast due less sensitivity to bad estimations. So
>> >well concept is penalization some risk plans - or use brute force - like
>> >COLUMN store engine does. Their plan is usually simply and tolerant to bad
>> >estimations.
> Disagree.  There is a special case of slow query where problem is not
> with the data but with the expression over the data; something in the
> query defeats sampled selectivity.  Common culprits are:
>
> *) CASE expressions
> *) COALESCE
> *) casts
> *) simple tranformational expressions
> *) predicate string concatenation

*) time/date functions, ie WHERE date_trunc( 'quarter', some_timestamp ) = '2014-1-1'

Though, in this case it's probably much better to teach the parser how to turn that into a range expression.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect                       jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner hints in Postgresql
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: Planner hints in Postgresql