On 01/13/2014 09:06 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> My thought, at least, was to always grab the planning time and then
> provide it for explain and/or explain analyze, and then for re-plan
> cases, indicate if a cached plan was returned, if a replan happened, and
> if a replan happened, what the old plan time and the new plan time was.
I like this solution due it is correctness and that all information is
included. But I also think my original path was fine in how it in its
simplicity solved the problem without adding any overhead in the
non-EXPLAIN case. Either solution would be fine by me. If the consensus
is that we want to always measure it I will look at implementing that
instead.
--
Andreas Karlsson
