Re: [PATCH] SQL assertions prototype - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: [PATCH] SQL assertions prototype
Date
Msg-id 52B18B33.1030702@vmware.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] SQL assertions prototype  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] SQL assertions prototype
Re: [PATCH] SQL assertions prototype
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/18/2013 01:39 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-12-18 13:07:51 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Here's another idea that doesn't involve SSI:
>>
>> At COMMIT, take a new snapshot and check that the assertion still passes
>> with that snapshot. Now, there's a race condition, if another transaction is
>> committing at the same time, and performs the same check concurrently. That
>> race condition can be eliminated by holding an exclusive lock while running
>> the assertion, until commit, effectively allowing the assertion to be
>> checked by only one transaction at a time.
>>
>> I think that would work, and would be simple, although it wouldn't scale too
>> well.
>
> It probably would also be very prone to deadlocks.

Hmm, since this would happen at commit, you would know all the 
assertions that need to be checked at that point. You could check them 
e.g in Oid order to avoid deadlocks.

- Heikki



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: hstore ng index for <@ ?