Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Why we are going to have to go DirectIO
Date
Msg-id 52A7A5FB.8080800@nasby.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Why we are going to have to go DirectIO  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Just to add a data point (and sorry, I can't find where someone was talking about numbers in the thread)...

For a while earlier this year we were running a 3.x kernel and saw a very modest (1-2%) improvement in overall
performance.This would be on a server with 512G RAM running ext4.
 
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect                       jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)                         http://jim.nasby.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: ANALYZE sampling is too good