On 11/20/2013 07:52 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:43 PM, David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> IMO A reasonable default cast function should error if the json contents
>> require anything more than a straight parse to be stored into jsonb. If the
>> user still needs to make the conversion we should have a standard and
>> configurable parser function with json input and jsonb output. In this case
>> the key-keep options would be "keep first encountered" or "keep last
>> encountered" or "fail on duplicate" the last of which would be the default.
>>
>> I have not really pondered storing scalars into jsonb but before pondering
>> usability are there any technical concerns. If the goal is to share the
>> backend with hstore then current hstore does not allow for this and so the
>> json aspect would either transfer back over or it would need customized
>> code.
> I confess to being a bit perplexed by why we want hstore and json to
> share a common binary format. hstore doesn't store hierarchical data;
> json does. If we design a binary format for json, doesn't that just
> obsolete store? Why go to a lot of trouble to extend our home-grown
> format if we've got a standard format to plug into?
>
> The thing that's really missing in all of these discussions (AFAICS)
> is the issue of creating index support for these types. If using some
> variant of the existing hstore format makes that easier, then I guess
> I understand the connection - but I'm not sure why or how that would
> be the case, and it would be nice to make the connection more
> explicit.
>
Oleg and Teodor have done quite a lot of work on a version of hstore
that supports nested structures. See their pgcon talk. With some
additions it has become in effect a non-standard notation for json.
Rather than repeat that work, my suggestion has been that they abstract
the common parts into a library that can be used by jsonb or whatever we
end up calling it as well as nested hstore. I understand Teodor is
working on this.
In general I share your feelings, though.
cheers
andrew
