On 10/14/2013 05:44 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-10-10 12:54:23 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 09/19/2013 06:12 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>>
>>> 2013/9/16 Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp <mailto:snaga@uptime.jp>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>> I'm looking at this patch, and I have a question here.
>>>
>>> Should "DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS" ignore error for non-existing trigger
>>> and non-existing table? Or just only for non-existing trigger?
>>>
>>>
>>> My opinion is so, both variants should be ignored - it should be fully
>>> fault tolerant in this use case.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> This thread seems to have gone cold, but I'm inclined to agree with Pavel.
>> If the table doesn't exist, neither does the trigger, and the whole point of
>> the 'IF EXISTS' variants is to provide the ability to issue DROP commands
>> that don't fail if their target is missing.
> -1, this seems to likely to just hide typos.
>
So if I say
DROP TRIGGER IF EXISTS foo ON bar;
you're ok with succeeding if foo is a typo, but not if bar is?
cheers
andrew
