Re: Requiring LLVM 14+ in PostgreSQL 18 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Requiring LLVM 14+ in PostgreSQL 18
Date
Msg-id 5255e75e-5a66-41ac-99d3-1998283b86e6@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Requiring LLVM 14+ in PostgreSQL 18  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Requiring LLVM 14+ in PostgreSQL 18
List pgsql-hackers
On 24.04.24 01:43, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Rebased over ca89db5f.

These patches look fine to me.  The new cut-off makes sense, and it does 
save quite a bit of code.  We do need to get the Cirrus CI Debian images 
updated first, as you had already written.

As part of this patch, you also sneak in support for LLVM 18 
(llvm-config-18, clang-18 in configure).  Should this be a separate patch?

And as I'm looking up how this was previously handled, I notice that 
this list of clang-NN versions was last updated equally sneakily as part 
of your patch to trim off LLVM <10 (820b5af73dc).  I wonder if the 
original intention of that configure code was that maintaining the 
versioned list above clang-7/llvm-config-7 was not needed, because the 
unversioning programs could be used, or maybe because pkg-config could 
be used.  It would be nice if we could get rid of having to update that.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: Comments about TLS (no SSLRequest) and ALPN
Next
From: Dmitry Koval
Date:
Subject: Re: Add SPLIT PARTITION/MERGE PARTITIONS commands