Re: [PG9.1] CTE usage - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ladislav Lenart
Subject Re: [PG9.1] CTE usage
Date
Msg-id 5237280A.7070203@volny.cz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PG9.1] CTE usage  (David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 16.9.2013 17:30, David Johnston wrote:
> Ladislav Lenart wrote
>> Hello all.
>>
>> I am curious about the following usage of CTEs:
>>
>> Imagine three tables:
>>  * item (id, item_type1_id, item_type2_id, ...)
>>  * item_type1 (id, ...)
>>  * item_type2 (id, ...)
>> where
>>  * item_type1_id is FK to item_type1 (id)
>>  * item_type2_id is FK to item_type2 (id)
>
> The mental model that comes to mind is:
>
> item (item_id)
> item_type1 (type1_id, item_id <FK>)
> item_type2 (type2_id, item_id <FK>)
>
> Or even better:
>
> item (item_id <PK>)
> item_type1 (item_id <PK; FK>)
> item_type2 (item_id <PK; FK>)
>
> You'd need a trigger on these tables if you want to enforce the "only a
> single type allowed" restriction but otherwise this model is much more
> usual.
>
>
> The other mental hang-up with your model is that the "item_type1_id" has a
> one-to-one relationship with the item_type1 table so that deleting the item
> means it is OK now to delete the associated type.  This is unusual.
>
> David J.

Thank you for your insightful comments. I will give it a thought.

Ladislav Lenart



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Johnston
Date:
Subject: Re: [PG9.1] CTE usage
Next
From: Vincent Veyron
Date:
Subject: Re: [PG9.1] CTE usage