On Feb 10, 2011, at 1:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, okay, let's go with that plan then. If we don't need to assume
> anything more than equality of version names being meaningful, I think
> chaining update scripts automatically should solve most of the
> complaints here. People who really want to maintain shortcut scripts
> still could, but I think it'd be an unusual case.
Yes, I think that this is a great solution. I only have to create on upgrade script for each release, and I don't have
toworry about concatenating anything or be required to change my versioning algorithm.
+1
Finally, a solution!
Best,
David
