Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Dan Langille
Subject Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Date
Msg-id 52348.74.239.169.41.1202152311.squirrel@nuts.unixathome.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, February 4, 2008 2:11 pm, Josh Berkus wrote:
> DVL,
>
>> Any respectable certification must be subjective.  You don't look at the
>> person, think about it, and decide. There must be a subjective and
>> independent test.  To do otherwise greatly reduces the value of the
>> certification.
>
> I think you mean "objective".

Yes, I do.  Sorry.

> Anyway, this is all fairly academic until Josh & Co. have  at least one
> certification exam at least halfway developed. At this point, I think
> we've collected enough opinions on -advocacy; maybe we should let the exam
> hackers do some work?

Yes, please.  Those that what to work on this project should discuss it on
the cert list, not advocacy.  Thank you.

--
Dan Langille - http://www.langille.org/


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [Cert] Re: PostgreSQL Certification
Next
From: Csaba Nagy
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Certification