Re: plpgsql.print_strict_params - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Tiikkaja
Subject Re: plpgsql.print_strict_params
Date
Msg-id 5233C21C.3030203@joh.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plpgsql.print_strict_params  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2013-09-14 03:33, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>> I thought about that, but it seemed more like a runtime option to
>> me. Any particular reason you think it would be better as a compile
>> time option?
>
> Seems like something that would be useful to change per function, rather
> than globally, no?

The way I see it, STRICT is like an assertion, and you *would* pretty 
much always change it globally.

However, it would be useful to also have the option to set it for a 
single function only.  Will look into that.  Thanks for the suggestion!


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal/design feedback needed: WITHIN GROUP (sql standard ordered set aggregate functions)
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: record identical operator