Re: pg_largeobjects - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: pg_largeobjects
Date
Msg-id 523004A7.7090501@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_largeobjects  (James Sewell <james.sewell@lisasoft.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 9/10/2013 9:49 PM, James Sewell wrote:
>
> As an aside, is there any reason to use pg_largeobjects if I am
> storing data under 1GB which doesn't require random reads any more? My
> impression is no?

one good reason to use LO is so you can read the data like its a
file.    me, I'd as soon use NFS or whatever for that, with a file path
in the database, but I understand there's scenarios where thats not
practical.

--
john r pierce                                      37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder
Date:
Subject: Re: Need help with Inet type
Next
From: Sergey Shelukhin
Date:
Subject: Re: not aborting transactions on failed select