Re: getting rid of maintainer-check - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Euler Taveira
Subject Re: getting rid of maintainer-check
Date
Msg-id 522F866E.6080309@timbira.com.br
Whole thread Raw
In response to getting rid of maintainer-check  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03-09-2013 23:41, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The maintainer-check target never really caught on, I think.  Most
> people don't run it, and that in turn annoys those who do.  Also, it
> doesn't provide much functionality.
> 
It has its use (before each release) but I agree that it isn't used
during minor version updates (because you need to update only one or two
po files).

> I propose that we get rid of it and roll the functionality into the
> regular build.
> 
By 'regular build' you mean --enable-nls? If so, +1.

> - Running duplicate_oids during the regular build was already discussed
> elsewhere recently.  There are some details to be resolved there, but
> it's doable.
> 
This has been bashing sufficient developers along the years. +1.

> - Checking for tabs in SGML files can be run during the regular
> documentation build without problems.
> 
This one too. +1.


--   Euler Taveira                   Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/  PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento,
Suporte24x7 e Treinamento
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Question regarding Sync message and unnamed portal
Next
From: Marti Raudsepp
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"