2013-08-19 19:20 keltezéssel, Andres Freund írta:
> Hi,
>
> On 2013-07-24 09:20:52 +0200, Antonin Houska wrote:
>> Hello,
>> the purpose of this patch is to limit impact of pg_backup on running server.
>> Feedback is appreciated.
> Based on a quick look it seems like you're throttling on the receiving
> side. Is that a good idea? Especially over longer latency links, TCP
> buffering will reduce the effect on the sender side considerably.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
Throttling on the sender side requires extending the syntax of
BASE_BACKUP and maybe START_REPLICATION so both can be
throttled but throttling is still initiated by the receiver side.
Maybe throttling the walsender is not a good idea, it can lead
to DoS via disk space shortage.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de http://www.postgresql.at/
