On 06/26/2013 07:05 AM, Jamie Martin wrote:
> FYI I submitted a slightly modified patch since Amit's measurements that is slightly faster.
Yes. My perspective is that this is a worthwhile optimization for a
minority, but fairly well-known, use case, provided that it doesn't
negatively impact any other, more common use case. Potential cases
where I can see negative impact are:
A) normal table with a few, mostly non-null columns (recent pgbench
testing seems to have validated no measurable impact).
B) table with many (400+) mostly non-null columns
C) table with many (400+) mostly null columns, where column #390 was
null and gets updated to a not null value
I don't *think* that Jamie's performance tests have really addressed the
above cases. However, do people agree that if performance on the patch
passes for all of A, B and C, then it's OK to apply?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
