Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan
Date
Msg-id 51D00FB6.9030008@vmware.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: GIN improvements part2: fast scan  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 28.06.2013 22:31, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> Now, I got the point of three state consistent: we can keep only one
> consistent in opclasses that support new interface. exact true and exact
> false values will be passed in the case of current patch consistent; exact
> false and unknown will be passed in the case of current patch
> preConsistent. That's reasonable.

I'm going to mark this as "returned with feedback". For the next 
version, I'd like to see the API changed per above. Also, I'd like us to 
do something about the tidbitmap overhead, as a separate patch before 
this, so that we can assess the actual benefit of this patch. And a new 
test case that demonstrates the I/O benefits.

- Heikki



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN improvements part 3: ordering in index