Re: ODBC constructs - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: ODBC constructs
Date
Msg-id 519B0C04.8070102@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ODBC constructs  (Dev Kumkar <devdas.kumkar@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: ODBC constructs
List pgsql-general
On 5/20/2013 10:11 PM, Dev Kumkar wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Atri Sharma <atri.jiit@gmail.com> wrote:

If you wish to work in C,then,I would suggest libpq.I would wait for more replies on this,as I have little knowledge
about psqlODBC.

Thanks for the comments. Yes objective is to work in C and found libpq useful but am not sure about psqlODBC.
It would be really great to get comments from community here regarding comparison between both of them and also performance perspective. Based on my reading so far libpq is good from performance perspective.

libpq lets you talk directly to postgres in its native tongue.

ODBC implements a sort of abstraction.     IMHO, its like trying to type with mittens on.





-- 
john r pierce                                      37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Dev Kumkar
Date:
Subject: Re: ODBC constructs
Next
From: Daniel Migowski
Date:
Subject: Cross compile custom data types for Linux and windows