Re: lock support for aarch64 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: lock support for aarch64
Date
Msg-id 5190E768.3000308@vmware.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to lock support for aarch64  (Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>)
Responses Re: lock support for aarch64  (Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>)
Re: lock support for aarch64  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 13.05.2013 15:39, Mark Salter wrote:
> I used the following patch to add lock support aarch64. It is just a
> copy of the arm support based on gcc builtins. Postgresql built with
> this patch passes the various tests.

I think this needs an "#ifdef HAVE_GCC_INT_ATOMICS", like the ARM codepath.

If we are to support aarch64, it would be good to have an aarch64 
machine on the buildfarm. Could you arrange that? See 
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/

- Heikki



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Better LWLocks with compare-and-swap (9.4)
Next
From: Jon Nelson
Date:
Subject: Re: corrupt pages detected by enabling checksums