Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
Date
Msg-id 516435D1.5020506@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions  (damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On 04/09/2013 01:38 AM, damien clochard wrote:

>>> No.
>>>
>>> That isn't to say I didn't understand that theory of doing so. I do.
>>> However, you essentially created a class of user that is above other users
>>> and that is explicitly not Open Source.
>>
>> I'm not arguing either way here... but if you think of DBaaS as "the
>> new packaging", it starts to seem more reasonable to give folks like
>> Heroku access at the same time as the traditional packagers.
>>
>
> Just to make things clear : my previous message is not about wether or
> nor a DBaaS provider should have early access to security releases (even
> if that's a good question).
>
> My message is about wether or not a DBaaS provider should be allowed to
> deploy the security release days before the official release date.
>

Right. Which I don't think they should be able to.

Joshua D. Drake

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Matteo Beccati
Date:
Subject: Re: elephant logo in OFM format?
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions