Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)
Date
Msg-id 513E090B.1080703@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> The remote end has entirely misinterpreted the day vs month fields.
> Now, to hit this you need to be using a datestyle which will print
> in an ambiguous format, so the "ISO" and "Postgres" styles are
> not vulnerable; but "German" and "SQL" are.

Is the "timezone" GUC a problem, also, for this?  Seems like that could
be much worse ...

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Materialized View patch broke pg_dump
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: transforms