Re: The case for version number inflation - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Darren Duncan
Subject Re: The case for version number inflation
Date
Msg-id 5131B0BC.1020400@darrenduncan.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: The case for version number inflation  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: The case for version number inflation
List pgsql-advocacy
On 2013.03.01 10:19 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 7.0 was because Postgres became crash-safe, and stopped crashing routinely.

Resilience to crashes by design is certainly a major feature when you didn't
have it before, and worthy of the 7.

So why doesn't http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/release-7-0.html make
any mention of this?

You'd think the major reason for the release naming would be highlighted at the
top of that page.

-- Darren Duncan



pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Ian Lawrence Barwick
Date:
Subject: Re: The case for version number inflation
Next
From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Date:
Subject: Re: The case for version number inflation