Re: posix_fadvise missing in the walsender - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: posix_fadvise missing in the walsender
Date
Msg-id 5121E35B.7010303@vmware.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to posix_fadvise missing in the walsender  (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>)
Responses Re: posix_fadvise missing in the walsender
List pgsql-hackers
On 17.02.2013 14:55, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> In access/transam/xlog.c we give the OS buffer caching a hint that we
> won't need a WAL file any time soon with
>
>      posix_fadvise(openLogFile, 0, 0, POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED);
>
> before closing the WAL file, but only if we don't have walsenders.
> That's reasonable because the walsender will reopen that same file
> shortly after.
>
> However the walsender doesn't call posix_fadvise once it's done with
> the file and I'm proposing to add this to walsender.c for consistency
> as well.
>
> Since there could be multiple walsenders, only the "slowest" one
> should call this function. Finding out the slowest walsender can be
> done by inspecting the shared memory and looking at the sentPtr of
> each walsender.

I doubt it's worth it, the OS cache generally does a reasonable job at 
deciding what to keep. In the non-walsender case, it's pretty clear that 
we don't need the WAL file anymore, but if we need to work any harder 
than a one-line posix_fadvise call, meh. I could be convinced otherwise 
with some performance test results, of course.

- Heikki



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: review: ALTER ROLE ALL SET
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add PQconninfoParseParams and PQconninfodefaultsMerge to libpq