On 01/31/2013 10:59 AM, Carlo Stonebanks wrote:
>>> Was there something constructive you might have been asking about that
> you forgot to include in this email? If so, what was it?
>
> I don't believe I forgot anything, as there was a question in the original
> post (which you did not include in your snip):
>
> "Are we seeing the demise of PG & Tcl? Should I advise my client to NOT
> upgrade any systems running Tcl apps and stick with legacy OS's?"
>
> Not the demise of PG in general, but specifically of concern for the PG &
> Tcl developers.
>
> Is this not a constructive question, and is it NOT about PG in general? I
> had asked in 2006 where to direct PG & Tcl questions and the answer was
> PGSQL general. See:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/725602300608011149i2a88a5b2t96817b85318
> 1e29c@mail.gmail.com
>
> Is there now somewhere else I should be asking about this?
Well I think part of the problem is that we may be talking apples and
oranges. If I am following correctly there are two PG/Tcl software
packages in play here.
) PL/Tcl
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/interactive/pltcl.html
Working with Tcl in the database.
2) PGtcl
http://flightaware.github.com/Pgtcl/
Working with PG from Tcl
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@gmail.com
