Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Heikki Linnakangas
Subject Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Date
Msg-id 5107A2F3.5080605@vmware.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>)
Responses Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
List pgsql-hackers
On 29.01.2013 11:58, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Can there be another way with which current patch code can be made better,
> so that we don't need to change the encoding approach, as I am having
> feeling that this might not be performance wise equally good.

The point is that I don't want to heap_delta_encode() to know the 
internals of pglz compression. You could probably make my patch more 
like yours in behavior by also passing an array of offsets in the new 
tuple to check, and only checking for matches as those offsets.

- Heikki



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup with -R option and start standby have problems with escaped password
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [sepgsql 2/3] Add db_schema:search permission checks