Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Subject | Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST |
Date | |
Msg-id | 51063F16.1010609@vmware.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST
Re: unlogged tables vs. GIST |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On 23.01.2013 17:30, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Jeevan Chalke > <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> I guess my earlier patch, which was directly incrementing >> ControlFile->unloggedLSN counter was the concern as it will take >> ControlFileLock several times. >> >> In this version of patch I did what Robert has suggested. At start of the >> postmaster, copying unloggedLSn value to XLogCtl, a shared memory struct. >> And >> in all access to unloggedLSN, using this shared variable using a SpinLock. >> And since we want to keep this counter persistent across clean shutdown, >> storing it in ControlFile before updating it. >> >> With this approach, we are updating ControlFile only when we shutdown the >> server, rest of the time we are having a shared memory counter. That means >> we >> are not touching pg_control every other millisecond or so. Also since we are >> not caring about crashes, XLogging this counter like OID counter is not >> required as such. > > On a quick read-through this looks reasonable to me, but others may > have different opinions, and I haven't reviewed in detail.> ... > [a couple of good points] In addition to those things Robert pointed out: > /* > + * Temporary GiST indexes are not WAL-logged, but we need LSNs to detect > + * concurrent page splits anyway. GetXLogRecPtrForUnloggedRel() provides a fake > + * sequence of LSNs for that purpose. Each call generates an LSN that is > + * greater than any previous value returned by this function in the same > + * session using static counter > + * Similarily unlogged GiST indexes are also not WAL-logged. But we need a > + * persistent counter across clean shutdown. Use counter from ControlFile which > + * is copied in XLogCtl.unloggedLSN to accomplish that > + * If relation is UNLOGGED, return persistent counter from XLogCtl else return > + * session wide temporary counter > + */ > +XLogRecPtr > +GetXLogRecPtrForUnloggedRel(Relation rel) From a modularity point of view, it's not good that you xlog.c needs to know about Relation struct. Perhaps move the logic to check the relation is unlogged or not to a function in gistutil.c, and only have a small GetUnloggedLSN() function in xlog.c I'd suggest adding a separate spinlock to protect unloggedLSN. I'm not sure if there's much contention on XLogCtl->info_lck today, but nevertheless it'd be better to keep this separate, also from a modularity point of view. > @@ -7034,6 +7078,8 @@ CreateCheckPoint(int flags) > LWLockAcquire(ControlFileLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE); > ControlFile->state = DB_SHUTDOWNING; > ControlFile->time = (pg_time_t) time(NULL); > + /* Store unloggedLSN value as we want it persistent across shutdown */ > + ControlFile->unloggedLSN = XLogCtl->unloggedLSN; > UpdateControlFile(); > LWLockRelease(ControlFileLock); > } This needs to acquire the spinlock to read unloggedLSN. Do we need to do anything to unloggedLSN in pg_resetxlog? - Heikki
pgsql-hackers by date: