Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marko Tiikkaja
Subject Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
Date
Msg-id 50EECF2A.1030806@joh.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/10/13 3:22 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> For versions >= 9.2 it would be better to allow passing in a
> pretty-print value, like 80 or 0, instead of just passing 'true'. The
> new line-wrapping that the integer argument triggers is much more
> readable than the supposedly pretty value that 'true' provides.

Ooh, I had no idea we exposed that in SQL.  I like this idea.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/perl should fail on configure, not make