Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Markus Wanner
Subject Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Date
Msg-id 50BCCBCF.9030304@bluegap.ch
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/03/2012 04:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Is there anything to be gained *now* from merging those two concepts?
>> I saw that as refactoring that can occur once we are happy it should
>> take place, but isn't necessary.
> 
> IMO it's a net loss in robustness of the autovac implementation.

Agreed.

That's only one aspect of it, though. From the other point of view, it
would be a proof of stability for the bgworker implementation if
autovacuum worked on top of it.

Regards

Markus Wanner



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Markus Wanner
Date:
Subject: Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security