Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and thousands of schemas - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and thousands of schemas
Date
Msg-id 50A31660.1010700@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and thousands of schemas  (Denis <socsam@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On 11/13/2012 10:12 PM, Denis wrote:
> Please don't think that I'm trying to nitpick here, but pg_dump has options
> for dumping separate tables and that's not really consistent with the idea
> that "pg_dump is primarily  designed for dumping entire databases".
>
>


Sure it is. The word "primarily" is not just a noise word here.

The fact that we have options to do other things doesn't mean that its
primary design goal has changed.


cheers

andrew


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and thousands of schemas
Next
From: Wu Ming
Date:
Subject: Re: PostreSQL v9.2 uses a lot of memory in Windows XP