On 10/19/12 1:26 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> What I'm saying is, we'll get nowhere promoting an application queue
> which is permanently inferior to existing, popular open source software.
> My advice: Forget about the application queue aspects of this. Focus
> on making it work for replication and matviews, which are already hard
> use cases to optimize.
>
> If someone can turn this feature into the base for a distributed
> queueing system later, then great. But let's not complicate this
> feature by worrying about a use case it may never fulfill.
And as someone else mentioned... we should call this a stream and not a queue, since this would be lacking in many
queuefeatures.
It certainly sounds like a useful framework to have.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
