> On 28 Sep 2023, at 23:50, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think I can reproduce the performance regression pointed out
> by Pavel Stehule [1].
> I can't confirm the measurable overhead.
Running the same pgbench command on my laptop looking at the average connection
times, and the averaging that over five runs (low/avg/high) I see ~5% increase
over master with the patched version (compiled without assertions and debug):
Patched event_triggers on: 6.858 ms/7.038 ms/7.434 ms
Patched event_triggers off: 6.601 ms/6.958 ms/7.539 ms
Master: 6.676 ms/6.697 ms/6.760 ms
This is all quite unscientific with a lot of jitter so grains of salt are to be
applied, but I find it odd that you don't see any measurable effect. Are you
seeing the same/similar connection times between master and with this patch
applied?
A few small comments on the patch:
+ prevent successful login to the system. Such bugs may be fixed by
+ restarting the system in single-user mode (as event triggers are
This paragraph should be reworded to recommend the GUC instead of single-user
mode (while retaining mention of single-user mode, just not as the primary
option).
+ Also, it's recommended to evade long-running queries in
s/evade/avoid/ perhaps?
Thanks for working on this!
--
Daniel Gustafsson
