Re: 64-bit API for large object - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: 64-bit API for large object
Date
Msg-id 50699454.4050706@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 64-bit API for large object  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/28/12 10:35 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Now there is one more problem in this area which is that the patch
> defined a new type pg_int64 for frontend code (postgres_ext.h).  This
> seems a bad idea to me.  We already have int64 defined in c.h.  Should
> we expose int64 to postgres_ext.h somehow?  Should we use standard-
> mandated int64_t instead?  One way would be to have a new configure
> check for int64_t, and if that type doesn't exist, then just don't
> provide the 64 bit functionality to frontend.

Or create a new type like pg_lo_off_t.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Hash id in pg_stat_statements
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list?