Re: pg_upgrade tests vs alter generic changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pg_upgrade tests vs alter generic changes
Date
Msg-id 50676D83.8050000@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade tests vs alter generic changes  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: pg_upgrade tests vs alter generic changes  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 09/29/2012 01:49 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 09/29/2012 11:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>>> The recent alter generic tests have broken pg_upgrade testing on 
>>> Windows
>>> and probably other non-collation-supporting platforms.
>> Is it still broken after Alvaro added the alternate expected file, and
>> if so why?  I don't see a reason that this should be failing only there.
>> I also note that it seems to be passing fine on buildfarm members other
>> than pitta.
>
> Well, that's a very good point. chough is actually the same machine, 
> doing an MSVC build. So why would this test pass there? I'll 
> investigate a bit more. Here's what the regression diffs look like 
> when run from pg_upgrade on pitta:


[hours of digging later]

It turns out that the reason is that we support collations on MSVC but 
not on Mingw.

*sigh*

I'll have to put it on my ever lengthening TODO list.

cheers

andrew





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: is JSON really "a type" (Re: data to json enhancements)
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: 64-bit API for large object