Re: ARC patent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Hansen
Subject Re: ARC patent
Date
Msg-id 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE56231@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to ARC patent  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: ARC patent  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > FYI, IBM has applied for a patent on ARC (AFAICS the patent
> > application is still pending, although the USPTO site is a
> little hard to grok):
>
>
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220040098541%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20040098541&RS=DN/20040098541

How will this affect the release of 8.0?

Wasn't this implemented in the early stages of the 7.5 cycle, long before may 20?


... John


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgdump
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ARC patent