ARC patent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject ARC patent
Date
Msg-id 23543.1105942525@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: IBM releases 500 patents  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Responses Re: ARC patent
Re: ARC patent
Re: ARC patent
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> FYI, IBM has applied for a patent on ARC (AFAICS the patent application
> is still pending, although the USPTO site is a little hard to grok):

>
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PG01&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=%2220040098541%22.PGNR.&OS=DN/20040098541&RS=DN/20040098541

Ugh.  We could hope that the patent wouldn't be granted, but I think
it unlikely, unless Jan is aware of prior art (like a publication
predating the filing date).  I fear we'll have to change or remove
that code.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: pgdump
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgdump