Re: pgdump - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgdump
Date
Msg-id 24033.1105947619@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgdump  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 01:19 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Just to be clear: what I understand the logic to be is "OR" across
>> multiple switches of the same type, but "AND" across switches of
>> two types.

> If I understand you correctly, you're suggesting that we should only
> report an error if none of the specified tables exist OR none of the
> specified schemas exist.

No, I was only expressing an opinion about what should be dumped,
not about what kind of diagnostic messages to issue.

If you want to warn about switches that fail to match anything,
go for it.  (I vote for just a warning, though, not a hard error.)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: pgdump
Next
From: "John Hansen"
Date:
Subject: Re: ARC patent