Neil Conway wrote:
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 2:13 PM
> To: John Hansen
> Cc: Dennis Bjorklund; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] lastval()
>
> John Hansen wrote:
> > Even more so if the 'currval(void) called before nextval(seq_name)'
> > error message could be supressed by a GUC variable and return 0
> > instead.
>
> I don't think that's a good idea at all. It seems
> unnecessary, it complicates the definition of the operation,
> and worse, "0" is a valid return value for currval(), so it
> would also be ambiguous.
K, No mysql-ism for postgresql then :)
(pardon my french)
> -Neil
>
>
... John
