Madison Kelly wrote:
> Under most circumstances I would agree with you completely. In my
> case though I have to decide between risking a loss of a
> user's data or
> attempt to store the file name in some manner that would
> return the same
> name used by the file system.
>
> The user (or one of his/her users in the case of an admin) may be
> completely unaware of the file name being an invalid unicode
> name. The
> file itself though may still be quite valid and contain information
> worthy of backing up. I could notify the user/admin that the
> name is not
> valid but there is no way I could rely on the name being
> changed. Given
> the choices, I would prefer to attempt to store/use the file
> name with
> the invalid unicode character than simply ignore the file.
>
> Is there a way to store the name in raw binary? If so,
> would this not
> be safe because to postgresql it should no longer matter what
> data is or
> represents, right? Maybe there is a third option I am not yet
> concidering?
Set the client_encoding to ascii when storing that name, and again when
retrieving it.
Or, use a bytea column.
>
> Madison
... John
