> The point of the proposal that I am making is to have a simple,
> low-maintenance solution for people who need a single-application
> database. A compromise somewhere in the middle isn't likely to be an
> improvement for anybody. For instance, if you want to have additional
> connections, you open up a whole collection of communication and
> authentication issues, which potential users of a single-application
> database don't want to cope with.
Yes, exactly.
In fact, most of the folks who would want an embedded PostgreSQL either
want no authentication at all, or only a single password. So supporting
authentication options other than trust or md5 is not required, or
desired AFAIK.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
