I realized only today that if role A is a member of role B,
A can ALTER and DROP objects owned by B.
I don't have a problem with that, but the documentation seems to
suggest otherwise. For example, for DROP TABLE:
Only the table owner, the schema owner, and superuser can drop a table.
Should I compose a doc patch, or is that too much of a corner case
to mention? I wanted to ask before I do the repetetive work.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
