It's rumoured that Andreas Pflug once said:
> Dave Page wrote:
>
>>That's alright. Tom Lane explained why it wouldn't work in the backend
>>anyway...
>>
>>Regards, Dave.
>>
>>
>>
> Dave,
>
> maybe you got me wrong.
> The CODING is already done... :-)
No, I understood. I meant that it's OK you worked on it because Tom
thought we had to do it that way.
Though it now seems a possibility to add a new version of
pg_get_viewdef(), which I might try to look at.
But that's for another day...
:-)
/D
