Re: Partial index on date column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Partial index on date column
Date
Msg-id 50057.80.177.99.193.1046981326.squirrel@ssl.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partial index on date column  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Partial index on date column  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
It's rumoured that Tom Lane once said:
> "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
>> CREATE INDEX pbx_log_today_idx ON pbx_log USING btree (pbx_time,
>> pbx_call_type, pbx_digits_source, pbx_digits_destination) WHERE
>> (pbx_date = '2003-03-06'::date);
>
>> I'm surprised by the following behaviour:
>
>> EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM pbx_log WHERE pbx_date = CURRENT_DATE;
>> [ no indexscan ]
>
>> Is this just an oddity because I don't have masses of data yet (4500
>> rows right now), or is this something the optimizer cannot handle?
>
> The optimizer does not think that "pbx_date = CURRENT_DATE" satisfies
> the partial index's WHERE condition.  I don't see any really good way
> around this; to improve matters there'd need to be some concept of a
> plan that is only good for a limited time.

Oh, OK. Thanks Tom. I can obviously work around this in my PHP code, it
just struck me as odd. I assume then that the optimizer doesn't execute
the function, and that that's done later on? Would the same be true of
simple expressions such as 1 + 2?
Regards, Dave.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: Aggregate "rollup"
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: I cant find it or I'm just lazy ?