Hmm, do you mean 64 bit postgresql on Solaris-Sparc isn't significantly
better performance-wise than 32 bit postgresql on Solaris-Sparc?
Interesting.
How about very large databases?
At 07:17 AM 2/13/2004 -0500, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:46:58PM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
> > Lots of people have been running it on 64 bit systems for _years_ now.
> > The Digital Alpha architecture, for instance, was introduced in the
> > 1992, and Sun UltraSPARC in 1995. PostgreSQL has been running well on
> > these sorts of systems for a lot of years now.
>
>But actually, there are problems with using postgres as a 64 bit
>application on Solaris. It works, and it's reliable, but I've never
>seen any evidence that it helps anything (and I've looked plenty).
>
>A
>
>--
>Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
>In the future this spectacle of the middle classes shocking the avant-
>garde will probably become the textbook definition of Postmodernism.
> --Brad Holland
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
