Re: Using a preprocessor for constants in SQL - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Frank Bax
Subject Re: Using a preprocessor for constants in SQL
Date
Msg-id 5.2.1.1.0.20050204084612.04090d90@pop6.sympatico.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Using a preprocessor for constants in SQL  (Arthur van Dorp <arthur_vd@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Using a preprocessor for constants in SQL  (Arthur van Dorp <arthur_vd@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-novice
At 08:30 AM 2/4/05, Arthur van Dorp wrote:
>When defining records with varchar entries (and at some other places)
>something like constants would be useful. They could look something like this:
>
>DEFINE short = 20;
>DEFINE long = 2000;
>
>CREATE TABLE example (
>short_string varchar (short),
>long_string varchar (long),
>long_string2 varchar (long)
>);
>[...]
>CREATE TABLE example200 (
>short_name varchar (short),
>long_name varchar (long)
>);
>
>Like this you could easily change values between test setup and final
>deployment. Is there anything like this or is there some elegant way to
>achieve this? Or do you all use some sort of preprocessors?


If you change the length of fields between testing and production, it would
invalidate your boundary testing!  What if there is a bug in your code that
presents itself when a field is 200 characters, but not when it is 50
characters long?  There is no difference in disk usage with the example you
gave, so I can see no reason to have different lengths for varchar fields
between test and prod environments.

Frank


pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Storing latitude and longitude
Next
From: Arthur van Dorp
Date:
Subject: Re: Using a preprocessor for constants in SQL