Re: - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From elein
Subject Re:
Date
Msg-id 5.1.0.14.2.20020911125626.054f5070@pop.norcov.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re:  (Jeff Davis <list-pgsql-hackers@empires.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
yes, deferring views to the end will also break if you have
SQL functions defined that use views.  The dependencies
is (are?) a really hard problem.

elein

At 12:41 PM 9/11/02, Jeff Davis wrote:

> > Is it not enough to defer all views until the end?  Why would they be
> > needed any sooner?
>
>I would think that views of views, or permissions on views, or prepared
>statements might need the right view to be declared first. There may be other
>examples as well.
>
>Your solution might be better than the current situation, however.
>
>Regards,
>         Jeff
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:    elein@norcov.com   (510)543-6079    "Taking a Trip. Not taking a
Trip."--anonymous
 
:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: