Re: I was spoiled by the MySQL timestamp field - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Lincoln Yeoh
Subject Re: I was spoiled by the MySQL timestamp field
Date
Msg-id 5.1.0.14.1.20030127120417.02849070@mbox.jaring.my
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: I was spoiled by the MySQL timestamp field  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: I was spoiled by the MySQL timestamp field
List pgsql-general
At 05:00 PM 1/26/03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>(BTW, the reason 'now' without "timestamp" in front works is that this
>is not a timestamp literal but a text literal, which will be coerced
>to timestamp at runtime.)

Is it known at the moment which of those methods the Postgresql team are
aiming to continue supporting for the near/medium future?

e.g. current_timestamp is guaranteed. now() for the forseeable future.
'now' for the next few versions.

Thanks,
Link.



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: getting weekly total based on daily...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: I was spoiled by the MySQL timestamp field