Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?
Date
Msg-id 5.1.0.14.0.20030506021411.0552fe80@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
At 12:09 PM 5/05/2003 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>think of it as a 7.4 proposal,
>instead.  (Or maybe 7.5, considering how close the 7.4 feature freeze
>date is.)

Good point. How close is it? It would be good to see this fixed in 7.4.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 03 5330 3172          |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: Transform groups (more FE/BE protocol issues)
Next
From: Philip Warner
Date:
Subject: Re: Why are triggers semi-deferred?