Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date
Msg-id 5.1.0.14.0.20021025130445.028923e8@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?  (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>)
Responses Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
I just reread the patch; is it valid to assume fseek and fseeko have the 
same  failure modes? Or does the call to 'fseek' actually call fseeko?


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Rod Taylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Security question : Database access control
Next
From: "D. Hageman"
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgresql and multithreading