Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Philip Warner
Subject Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Date
Msg-id 5.1.0.14.0.20021025115030.06e73590@mail.rhyme.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
List pgsql-hackers
The patch will not work. Please reread my quoted email.

At 09:32 PM 24/10/2002 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Philip Warner wrote:
> >
> > You are quite correct. It should read:
> >
> >          #ifdef HAVE_FSEEKO
> >               ctx->hasSeek = fseeko(...,SEEK_SET);
> >          #else
> >               ctx->hasSeek = FALSE;
> >          #endif
> >
> > pipes are the main case for which we are checking.
>
>OK, I have applied the following patch to set hasSeek only if
>fseek/fseeko is reliable.



----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem?