Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

At 10:08 PM 23/10/2002 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Well, that certainly changes the functionality of the code.  I thought
>that fseeko test was done so that things that couldn't be seeked on were
>detected.

You are quite correct. It should read:
        #ifdef HAVE_FSEEKO             ctx->hasSeek = fseeko(...,SEEK_SET);        #else             ctx->hasSeek =
FALSE;       #endif
 

pipes are the main case for which we are checking.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498)          |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/